A decision by Gisborne District Council to give the green light to Canadian company TAG Oil for an exploratory well to be drilled west of Gisborne city has been condemned by an RMA Commissioner.

Manu Caddie, who is also a Gisborne District Councillor, says he is supporting an application for a judicial review of the decision based on the public interest test, cumulative effects and the way potential cultural impacts have been handled in the assessment phase.

“Two thousand local residents signed a petition last year requesting any application to drill in the district be publicly notified. All they want is a chance to look into the application and make submissions if they have concerns.”

The Council’s Regional Policy Statement and Combined Regional and District Plan are largely silent on drilling activities and the Council has agreed to review the plan once the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment issues her report on fracking later this year.

“The PCE in her interim report on fracking raised a number of real concerns about drilling on the East Coast and the lack of regulation in the petroleum industry as a whole” said Mr Caddie. “Until those concerns are addressed the public should have the right to examine applications and comment on them.”

“An industry representative said just last week that they have nothing to hide, so why are they afraid to give our community the opportunity to be part of the decision-making process.”

Mr Caddie said he understood the company had threatened to leave the district if the application was publicly notified and comments from vested interests meant staff felt pressure to let the application go through non-notified. “I’m sure everyone will deny that is the case, but this is what staff have told me.”

Mr Caddie said it was a sad day for the district and democracy. “The petition of 2,000 citizens must be the largest set of submissions Council has received on a single issue and it is bitterly disappointing that a simple request to have the opportunity to make comments at a public hearing – for or against the proposal – has been seen as less important than the desire of the company to rush into drilling.

Mr Caddie said he believed Council had good grounds to notify the application – while the risk of significant immediate pollution may be limited to a well explosion like the one that happened in the United States last month or limited contamination of land and streams, the cumulative effects of the activity should be taken into account at each stage and the RMA allows for public notification when the risk may be small but the potential effects significant if something goes wrong.

“There is scant information in the application on the process for rehabilitating the site while industry publications suggest at least half of all wells corrode within 30 years allowing fugitive emissions of gas and oil, long after they have ceased production. The area is around known fault lines and aquifers, who knows what impact drilling into those could have.”

The documentation provided with the Council decision suggests one or two individuals within local iwi had signed off on behalf of the tribe with no evidence of hui-a-iwi to provide a mandate or majority of iwi members’ endorsement.

“Iwi and hapū have a right under Te Tiriti o Waitangi, New Zealand law and international agreements to make free, prior and informed decisions on activities that impact on their traditional lands, waterways and air space. From the information supplied I can’t see evidence of that happening in this situation and a number of iwi members have expressed extreme frustration with the process used by the company to consult with iwi.“

Mr Caddie said central government should provide much more support and resources to iwi and hapū that are faced with extractive industries moving into their area.

“Around the world we have seen indigenous peoples welcome industries that make grand promises then leave after ruining the environment local peoples have depended on for generations. It is a familiar story we are seeing played out in our own backyard.”

– – –

Gisborne District Council: Decision Documents

– – –

CONTACT: Manu Caddie – Tel. 0274202957 / Email:


6 responses to “A Dark Day for the District”

  1. perak NIKORA Avatar
    perak NIKORA

    I have news for them – Gisborne District Council that is. We, Tangata Whenus have Standing Orders that supercede the non constitutional arrangements acting under the color of rule…note I said acting….and thats all they are all doing.

    Yes Maori will prosper and touche’, but whats the point if our land is eroding into the sea at the speed of light….

    Perak & Venus

  2. Jennie HH Avatar
    Jennie HH

    The decision not to notify goes against the wishes of the local community. Oil exploration is new to our area and GDC has a discretion to notify if it wishes.

    It also makes sense to bundle the consent required together instead of considering each step, piecemeal. I refer to Tag Oil’s intention and predictions of developing a ‘Bakken shale’ type, mutil-wells (likely to require fracking) ‘Texas of the South’ landscape out-east here. First the access and pad consents and now the drilling consents, all non-notified to date. The Environmental Defence Society’s opinion expressed the view that bundling consents was more consistent with the idea of sustainable management than splitting them up but Council continues to allow that even though it could require them to be sought together.

    We are also critical of the applicants. They could ask for the applications to be notified if they really took their social licence to operate concept seriously. But they don’t. They are not from New Zealand and are just taking the easiest route to suit their commercial interests. There’s no sense of them being at all concerned about our community.

  3. Alex Dobie Avatar
    Alex Dobie

    Gosh Cr Caddie the GDC District Plan’s needs to be changed urgently having such activities which carry a high risk of potential damage to the environment able to be considered as a “non Notified” activities tells me that an amendment to Gisborne’s District Plan is well justified. Not sure a judicial review will produce the results you want as, it appears proper process has been followed. Is it not more a case of GDC processes are at fault in that they do not reflect the public’s desire / right to have a say in activities that have the potential to damage the environment. The planning staff would have been between a rock and a hard place if the rules in the District Plan allowed for this activity to be considered by way of a non-notified application That said they still should have decided to notify it because of the high public interest.

    1. Jennie HH Avatar
      Jennie HH

      ..Fyi the petition Councillor Caddie refers to was signed within a short timeframe of 4-6 weeks around May 2012. It said:
      “We request Gisborne District Council publicly notify any Resource Consent applications relating to oil/gas exploration or production because of the special circumstances and high potential environmental impact of the activities.” Notes-
      Special circumstances include:
       the current NZ Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s inquiry into fracking;
       the increasing fracking bans and moratoria in overseas jurisdictions;
       the lack of scientific information about the risks of fracking in the geology of the Gisborne district;
       the lack of evidence demonstrating the integrity of wells during and after use;
       the lack of evidence demonstrating a safe disposal method for produced water mixed with introduced chemicals and naturally occurring toxic substances.

      High potential impacts include:
       the reduction in fresh water available for irrigation, stock and human use because of high take for mining;
       fresh water contamination, air and soil pollution;
       increased noise, traffic, roading costs and light levels in rural areas;
       induced earthquakes;
       negative impacts on human and animal health, community wellbeing & lifestyles;
       negative impacts on existing primary industries, regional tourism and district landscapes.

  4. Paul Bailey Avatar

    A sad decision Manu. Its why strengthing regulations (including making oil & gas wells prohibited activities) is a key platform in my campaign to get elected to HBRC.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: